Which kind of brings up interesting points because seeing some of the LPGA British Open, women's golf has a lot of bright stars and attractive people they could market that aren't being recognized. Take for instance Paula Creamer, who is in a sense a rival to Wie. Creamer is just 18 and from California and did decent at the British Open, and recently won the Evian Masters
Paula Creamer, Wie, Morgan Pressel
In addition you have fairly young golfers in Annika Sorenstam (34) and Christie Kerr (27) and women's golf could be in the limelight for a long time to come with a good mix of stars, with Wie kind of serving as a Tiger Woods to open the flood gates because she is a young stud.
So should Wie continue to compete with the men? She is obviously good enough to compete with a lot of them but should stick with the women's tournament for now. The girl is still 16. Nothing against her competing with men because she has proven she can hold her own, but Pressel has a point in what she can do for the women's game. After she helps them get established then she can do what Sorenstam has done.
2 comments:
I think I have to disagree. I think it's great that she's been successful in both men's and women's tournaments. If she can compete, I don't think her age or gender should make a difference.
Nate
I felt the need to point out you called her "Paul Creamer" on first reference.
And I think Michelle Wie, if she wants to play pro golf at 16 (instead of, you know, just being 16) should do it against women.
Jason
Post a Comment